Submit your site


   Login
 
 
Forum Rules
  • This is a moderated forum, all posts will be checked for bad language and composition.
  • Before you post in the information section, make sure the information you add is fully accurate.
  • All posts within the local and national policy sections must be factually correct and substantively debatable.
  • Feel free to be provocative or even politically incorrect, within the rules set.
  • No threats, sexual or racist remarks of any nature will be tolerated. Any posts that violate these common sense rules will be removed. Your account may also be suspended after so many violations.
  • Creating multiple accounts and pretending to be someone else will result in instant termination of all accounts. We check up on all accounts / IP addresses frequently. You must register and login in order to post within the forums. Your information will not be given out or sold for mailing lists. The register and login section is at the top right. You can also register or login here.
Subject: Election Day Woes
Prev Next
You are not authorized to post a reply.

Author Messages
nonleft
Posts:112
Senior User
Senior User
Online Status:User is Offline


11/10/2006 12:05 AM  

While America was treated to a new dawn of Defeatocrat leadership in the US House and Senate, Utah held its ground.

If you think it was a lame duck congress before, just wait! Having a California style, left coast leader who votes like a Communist as speaker of the US House will be a new experience for all of us. I hope the President uses his veto power on every bill the Defeatocrats send through congress. They have a very small majority anyway so its not like much will change.

As usual, we had a real treat on election day as we got to hear USU's own Tax funded Dr. William Furlong of the Political Science Department on KVNU Crosstalk with Jennie Christensen. He claims that he is neither a Defeatocrat nor a Republican yet for a good part of a half an hour, he sounded like a public relations speaker for the Democratic National Committee. He went on to basically say that Utahans are stupid because they vote conservative.

Again, this is the type of people and institutions that our Utah Tax money goes toward. You ask me why I don't support public education? This is one of the many reasons. You see, education use to be about learning math, English, writing, science and so on. Today, it's more about junk science, left wing politics, free Sex, socialism and anti Americanism. I support private education!

The kicker of this whole interview with Dr. William Furlong on KVNU was his admission of what he thought our system of Government is suppose to be based on. You can listen to the whole interview here. There was two calls in the last 5 minutes of the interview. One of the callers corrected Dr. William Furlong when he said that we are a Democracy. The caller told him that we are a Republic. He told the caller that he was wrong and that we are not a Republic. He shrugged the term of “Republic” off as if it were nothing more than a “non inherited government.” Wow! And you wonder why our kids and college graduates are so screwed up these days!? Many of them think that the supreme government of this land is the United Nations or should be the United Nations. I know that George Washington would very much disagree with Dr. William Furlong about being a Democracy! Many of the founding fathers made references as to the importance of our being a Republic. There are great differences between the two. One major difference is that sovereignty is also granted to individuals under a Republic where under a Democracy, is is only granted collectively. Or course, you would never learn this in class these days in public schools.

May Heaven watch over America and our Republic these next two years! We will need it!

Outspoken
Posts:26
Junior User
Junior User
Online Status:User is Offline


11/11/2006 12:29 AM  
I'm actually glad that the dumocrats won because now they will receive all the blame for everything that happens instead of President Bush. After they raise everyone's taxes and screw up the economy and who knows what else, people will be more than happy to vote for a president who doesn't belong to that party.
mulhollandj
Posts:230
Senior User
Senior User
Online Status:User is Offline


01/28/2007 1:10 PM  
But aren't taxes going to need to be raised with how we are spending? Bush has increased the national debt by 50%, since elected, to $9 trillion and that doesn't even include all the IOUs in Social Security and Medicaid. Actually what we really need is comprehensive spending reform. People actually need to read the Constitution and decide what programs the federal government is actually authorized to spend our money on. Are the Democrats better than the Republicans? I don't see much of a difference except for the Democrats are more honest as to what they are doing. Can somebody please tell me the difference between the two parties?
Outspoken
Posts:26
Junior User
Junior User
Online Status:User is Offline


02/07/2007 1:04 AM  
Yeah, I can tell you one really big difference - THEY DON'T SUPPORT ABORTION!!!! and the Constitution Party can't even muster a small percentage of the vote.
mulhollandj
Posts:230
Senior User
Senior User
Online Status:User is Offline


02/11/2007 4:55 PM  
Who's against abortions? I wouldn't say the Republicans are. Look at the major candidates they are pushing for the presidential run like McCain and Gulianni. They are pro-abortion. The Republicans used to be against abortion just like they used to be against world government, socialism, etc. But in reality they are just a couple years behind the Democrats.
Outspoken
Posts:26
Junior User
Junior User
Online Status:User is Offline


02/13/2007 12:49 AM  
I hope I do not have to vote for McCain or Gulianni, but they would still be better than any of the democratic candidates. McCain because he has had to go to war, and Gulianni because of his leadership. Since the Supreme Court is where the abortion issue will be decided, both of them have stated that they will only nominate judges that follow the constitution, whereas Democratic nominees would make it a litmus test to have pro-abortion judges nominated. I am hoping that the Republican nominee will be someone more conservative, because I'm sorry, but at this point there are no other candidates in any other party that are viable.
ineffable
Posts:8
New User
New User
Online Status:User is Offline


04/10/2007 12:23 PM  
Yeah, I can tell you one really big difference - THEY DON'T SUPPORT ABORTION!!!!

Once again, it's come down to this...
Voting based on pro-life v pro-choice is completely pointless. It doesn't matter that 99% of republican politicians are against abortion. They will not do anything about it. If you don't believe me, look at 2002-2006. Republicans had the Executive branch and both houses of congress. They could've made an ammendment to the constitution to ban abortion across the board (although it probably wouldn't have been ratified by a sufficient number of states...). The republicans didn't even try. THEY NEVER WILL. Why? It's political suicide. Quite simply, republican politicians lack the spine to do it.

And while you're going about calling the new leadership defeatocrats, consider this... the troop surge will fail. All it is doing is upping troop levels to where they were at in early 2005. Not good enough. There is only ONE WAY to win the Iraq war, and that is to reinstate the draft and send at least 100,000 additional troops. Another thing that our president is quite unwilling to do. Why? Because it would essentially kill the chances of any republican winning the 2008 election. The administrations unwillingness to do the hard thing to win this war (which I've been against from the beginning, but I'd still like to see it be successful) is an example of the politics of defeat.
Outspoken
Posts:26
Junior User
Junior User
Online Status:User is Offline


04/12/2007 11:53 PM  
Democrats do not believe in the sanctity of human life according to their own platform. I could never vote for a Democrat for this simple reason, because I would be saying that I agree with them. I might be tempted to vote for another party, but then I would just be giving my vote to a Democrat.
nonleft
Posts:112
Senior User
Senior User
Online Status:User is Offline


04/15/2007 10:46 PM  
I fully agree with Outspoken! I'm not too happy with Republicans right now myself. They give in too easy to Democrats. This is why they lost in 2006. I will still vote for Republicans because they are as good as it gets and they can win. Any other party as good as some of them are is a vote for the Democrats.
You are not authorized to post a reply.



ActiveForums 3.7