Forum Rules
  • Please refer to the Forum Rules Amended section for additional rules and modifications.
  • This is a moderated forum, all posts will be checked for bad language and composition.
  • Before you post in the information section, make sure the information you add is fully accurate.
  • All posts within the local and national policy sections must be substantively debatable.
  • Feel free to be provocative or even politically incorrect, within the rules set fourth.
  • No threats, sexual or racist remarks of any nature will be tolerated. Any posts that violate these common sense rules will be removed. Your account may also be suspended after so many violations.
  • Creating multiple accounts and pretending to be someone else will result in instant termination of all accounts. We check up on all accounts / IP addresses frequently. You must register and login in order to post within the forums. Your information will not be given out or sold for mailing lists.
Passports and Irony
Last Post 14 Jul 2007 06:12 AM by Fiery Darts. 0 Replies.
Printer Friendly
Sort:
PrevPrev NextNext
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Author Messages
Eric WiddisonUser is Offline
Basic Member
Basic Member
Posts:135

--
14 Jul 2007 06:12 AM  

In January, a new law was implemented requiring all travelers entering the US by air from anywhere to provide a passport.  This meant that visitors to Canada, Mexico, and other nearby places now needed a passport to return from their trips, which they didn't need before.  This has created an unprecedented demand for passports, which has in turn created a major backlog.  For example, when I applied for a passport in February, the website said that there was a 6-8 week delay.  I was told as I applied that the delay would be 8-10 weeks.  Twelve weeks later, the delay was a mere 12 weeks, and I was still two weeks away from getting my passport.

Now, the State Department gets its direction from Congress, especially on something as big as this.  That is why I found great irony in a news story about a California congressman who is criticizing the State Department for the backlog.  Apparently it never occurred to him that requiring a large group of people who have traditionally traveled without a passport to have one would cause a significant increase in demand, which the State Department's (Congressionally dictated) budget didn't support the manpower to meet.

I suppose I shouldn't give him a hard time.  After all, I voted for congressmen who enacted this rule, so it's really my fault that my passport took twice as long as planned.

You are not authorized to post a reply.

Active Forums 4.1
Local Video