Has the Associated Press (AP) become another terrorist front group? I have noticed an incredible amount of propaganda coming out from the AP's coverage of the Iraqi war for some time. I found an article which I think raises some serious questions, from "little green footballs"
Peace
At the Boston Herald, Jules Crittenden says the Associated Press has gone off the rails and become a tool for anti-American viewpoints and enemy propaganda: Does AP stand for Al-Qaeda Propaganda? (Hat tip: LGF readers.)
I wish it stopped with the AP’s effort to give the enemy in Iraq a fair shake, as if terrorists were freedom fighters. Then I look at the AP copy I see nightly. The president of the United States gives a speech. The AP grants him a couple of fragmentary quotes before allowing his failed 2004 challenger and other opponents several full paragraphs to denounce him.
There is the bizarre work of Charles J. Hanley, an AP apologist for Saddam Hussein. He dismisses evidence of weapons programs and reports on the deep frustration Saddam felt when he could not convince the world of his good intentions, in those years when he was murdering his own people and playing a hard-nosed game of cat-and-mouse with U.N. weapons inspectors that led to their removal.
Last week, the AP gave us a lengthy series on the U.S. detention of terrorism suspects. The AP’s opinion was evident. Bilal Hussein was the poster boy. The salient fact that Hussein was captured with an al-Qaeda leader was buried. Al-Qaeda has killed and abducted dozens of journalists, Iraqi, American and European. Mainly Iraqi. I wonder: What’s so special about this particular Iraqi journalist that he could associate freely with al-Qaeda?
I look at Hussein’s photos. Terrorists trying to kill Americans. Terrorists posing with dead civilians. Bilal Hussein knows things about these men, who they are, how they operate. I’m thinking, Bilal Hussein looks like an accessory to murder. I’m thinking, I hope the U.S. intelligence agents who have him are getting good information out of him. And I’m wondering, who does The Associated Press want to win this war?
The screaming bias of the Associated Press has become incredibly obvious, yet they continue to pretend objectivity; here’s AP president Tom Curley in the Washington Post, distorting the facts of the Bilal Hussein case once again: In Iraq, a Journalist in Limbo. He does not even mention that Bilal Hussein was captured with an Al Qaeda leader, even though AP has known this almost from the very beginning of the incident.
|